TIME has published a study that says that abortion is safer than child birth. Yes, you read that right. According to this new study, abortion supposed risks are none existence.
Abortion has a scary reputation, regardless of whether you’re for or against it. But the perception that it’s a high-risk procedure isn’t rooted in truth, according to new research.
Although more than half of states counsel women on the risks of abortion, a study published online Monday in Obstetrics & Gynecology finds that a legal abortion is actually far safer than giving birth.From the beginning, you can ask, "safer to whom? Not for the baby of course, who is killed. Does the baby in the womb count for something to this people? What if they were threatened when they were at the womb with death, would they still say the same about abortion being safe?
The research discovered that women are actually 14 times more likely to die during or after delivery than as a result of complications from abortion. “There’s a lot of stigma surrounding abortion,” says Elizabeth Nash, who tracks state policies on reproductive health for the N.Y.-based Guttmacher Institute, a pro-choice reproductive health research group. “This study is telling us it’s a lot safer than having a baby.”There you go, a group that promotes abortion says that abortion is safe, and even better than giving birth, is not surprising for them to reach such a conclusion. Well, if it is safer to abort than giving birth, then I think they hope for people to abort by hordes, and make them a lot of money along the way. What's a baby for them? Worthless as it seems, seems it doesn't matter if the baby dies during abortion, therefore, it's not safe for the baby.
Twenty-six states have intensive counseling for women who seek abortions. Some of the states distribute materials with questionable information, such as the risk of breast cancer after having an abortion or the negative impact on mental health.
“The people developing these counseling materials are not really interested in talking about the facts,” says Nash, who wasn’t involved in the study. “They are interested in persuading a woman from getting an abortion in the first place.”
That said, most of the counseling materials also includes information about the risks of pregnancy, although it can get overshadowed by the emphasis on the dangers of abortion.Well, I don't know about cancer, but sounds about right. But a woman who performs a lot of abortions, may damage their womb so much, that they end up being unable to hold onto an embryo, therefore, never being able to have a baby.
The article goes on praising the new figures about abortion, and how better it is to abort than to give birth. I wonder, if everybody opts to abort, within a few years, these people would go broke, since there wouldn't be anybody to abort!!
It is a good thing, that at the end, and with few lines, the study was refuted. But I get the feeling that the article wanted to promote abortion, rather than to report on the new study.
Anti-abortion groups took issue with the study, complaining, as did Paul Wilson of the Culture and Media Institute in a post on LifeNews.com titled “Reuters Pushes Biased Study Claiming Abortion Safer Than Birth,” that the researchers “were either abortion doctors or had strong ties to the abortion industry.”
Dr. Donna Harrison, director of research and public policy at the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, told HealthDay News that she doubted the study’s findings and called them “speculation.”If the authors of the "study" have strong ties to the abortion industry (yes, it is an industry, they make millions out of killing innocent kids), then such a study is suspect to the most!!
We will have to wait till another, more credible study appears, to see if really it's safer to abort than to give birth.
But then again, even if it would be clinically true, you know that by killing the baby, that position is totally wrong!!
No comments:
Post a Comment